






|
Even if the property meets the above criteria, Utah Open Lands must evaluate the proposed parcel with the following considerations in mind: · Whether the property has significant resources that can be protected even if adjacent property is developed; · Whether the easement would be difficult to enforce or would require extensive management; · Whether the property owner insists on provisions in the easement which UOL believes would seriously diminish the property’s primary conservation values; · Whether the property is of sufficient size so that its conservation resources are likely to remain intact even if adjacent properties are developed; · Whether the property would be an island of conservation, creating a patchwork of unconnected, protected properties; · Whether the conservation resources for which the lands are being preserved are currently in a condition which will insure the long-term viability of those conservation resources; · Whether the property is part of a larger conservation plan for the community or region. |

|
How the Program Works |
|
Utah Open Lands Conservation Association, Inc. • 2188 S. Highland Dr., 203 Salt Lake City Utah 84106 • tel: 801.463.6156 • fax: 801.463.6226 • Executive Director: Wendy Fisher Wendy@UtahOpenLands.org • Operations: Catherine Cargill Catherine@UtahOpenLands.org • Conservation Director: Arthur Morris, PhD Arthur@UtahOpenLands.org |
|
Home |
|
Conservation Easement Process Site Visit In order to determine whether a piece of property has conservation potential, a site visit must be conducted. An initial site visit will be conducted by a Utah Open Lands staff member. Other visits to the property will be required in the future, and we hope this will not be an inconvenience for you. |
|
|
|
Current Conditions / Baseline Documentation Report In accordance with IRS regulations and in compliance with Utah Open Lands monitoring guidelines, the current condition of the property must be established through a report. The IRS stipulates that the landowner may provide this document to the Grantee organization, or our organization can put the necessary documents together. This report will consist of maps, pictures and a narrative description of the parcel. All parties must agree at the signing of the conservation easement that the baseline document serves as an accurate representation of the property. This baseline document is updated on an annual, semi-annual, or in some instances, a quarterly basis by the Grantee (UOL) to ensure that the terms of the conservation easement are enforced. |
|
Conservation Easement Draft A draft of the conservation easement can be done by Utah Open Lands staff, or the landowners’ attorney. Utah Open Lands insists that the landowner consult an attorney regardless of who drafts the easement. Once the easement is in draft stage, the landowner and Utah Open Lands staff will review the document, suggesting changes and applying the language to a ground proofing test of the property—primarily to insure that the easement achieves the preservation of the conservation resources on the property. A final draft is reviewed by both the landowner’s attorney and Utah Open Lands’ attorney. If the landowner chooses to waive his/her right to an attorney, Utah Open Lands respectfully requests that the landowner sign a letter acknowledging that Utah Open Lands made you aware of your right to seek legal counsel. |
|
|
|
Title Insurance As with any land transaction, it is important that the landowner verify that he/she has clear title to his/her property. For this purpose, we require that the landowner provide us with title insurance. Mineral Interest In some instances landowners may or may not be aware that they do not own the mineral estate of their property. This can be a critical issue in any tax value a landowner is interested in pursuing. If the mineral rights have been severed from the property after 1973, the landowner must obtain a geologist report indicating that the presence of any mineral of monetary interest, which could be extracted from the property, is "so remote as to be negligible." Please contact Utah Open Lands as soon as possible if this is the case. |
|
Conservation Easement Criteria
In accordance with the provisions for conservation easements set up under 170 (h) of the IRS CODE, in order for a property to qualify for a conservation easement it must adequately protect one of five listed conservation resources criteria: Scenic – Property that is valuable to the community as open space due to its proximity to developing areas, or its impact on a view corridor. Established by its visibility from a major roadway; in some instances correlated with an actual vehicle count. |
|
|
|
Historic or Cultural –Property that is valuable to a community because of its historical or cultural value or its proximity to an historically significant area. This can even apply to a land use pattern; however, if this is the only criteria being used, National Register Designation is preferred.
Wildlife or Ecological – Property that contains endangered, threatened, or ecologically significant species, or natural systems. This often includes wetlands and migration corridors, critical habitat as identified by the division of natural resources; however, added to this criteria is that the area be of significant size to insure that, should the property be surrounded by development, the wildlife values can be protected. |
|
Established in accordance with a clearly delineated government policy – Property with significant agricultural or forestry resources. Agricultural practices as defined under the Farmland Assessment Act definitely qualify; forested properties may qualify as well. Public Recreation or Education – this has been the criteria most commonly used in establishing trails and greenways which are more significant for the connection they provide to recreational opportunities; an important component of this criteria is the fact that the public must be allowed on the property. |
|
|
|
|
Conservation Investor Program An Innovative Solution |
|
|
|
What Is A Conservation Investor? |